Posted by: PARTHA DAS SHARMA | October 15, 2008

Underground coal gasification (UCG) – Potential to increase coal reserve worldwide in environment-friendly manner:

Underground coal gasification (UCG) – Potential to increase coal reserve worldwide in environment-friendly manner:

1. Introduction: Worldwide, coal reserves are quite vast – over 10 trillion tonnes. However, unless cleaner and cheaper ways can be found to convert coal to gas or liquid fuels, coal is unlikely to become an acceptable replacement for dwindling and uncertain supplies of oil and natural gas. Mining coal is dangerous work. Coal is dirty to burn and much of the coal in the ground is too deep or too low in quality to be mined economically. Today, less than one sixth of the world’s coal is economically accessible. However, there is a renewed interest world over to revive the old technology that offers promise to substantially increase usable coal reserves and make coal a clean and economic alternative fuel. Known as underground coal gasification (UCG), this technology converts coal to a combustible gas underground.

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) is the process by which coal is converted in situ into a combustible gas that can be used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. It is a process to convert unminable underground coal/lignite into combustible gases (i.e., combustible syngas – a combination of hydrogen and carbon monoxide) by gasifying. UCG uses a similar process to surface gasification. The main difference between both gasification processes is that in UCG the cavity itself becomes the reactor so that the gasification of the coal takes place underground instead of at the surface.

Despite considerable research and testing, no commercially viable project has yet been demonstrated anywhere. Research has been conducted principally in Western Europe, USA, China, the former Soviet Union and Australia.

2. Benefits of UCG – As a method of exploiting coal, UCG represents an environmental improvement on the combination of coal mining and surface combustion of coal. It is also safer and intuitively more efficient.

Environmental benefits of UCG over underground coal mining for fuelling power generation include:

(i) Lower fugitive dust, noise and visual impact on the surface

(ii) Lower water consumption

(iii) Low risk of surface water pollution

(iv) Reduced methane emissions

(v) No dirt handling and disposal at mine sites

(vi) No coal washing and fines disposal at mine sites

(vii) No ash handling and disposal at power station sites

(viii) No coal stocking and transport

(ix) Smaller surface footprints at power stations

(x) No mine water recovery and significant surface hazard liabilities on abandonment.

Additional benefits include:

(i) Health and safety

(ii) Potentially lower overall capital and operating costs

(iii) Flexibility of access to mineral

(iv) Larger coal resource exploitable

Note: At present, natural gas offers attractions as a clean fuel that UCG may find difficult to compete.

3. Process of Underground Coal Gasification (UCG):

The basic UCG process involves drilling two wells into the coal, one for injection of the oxidants (water/air or water/oxygen mixtures) and another well some distance away to bring the product gas to the surface. Coal is gasified underground by creating a linkage through the coal seam between the injection and production wells and injecting air (or oxygen) and water (or steam) into the underground reaction zone. The injected gases react with coal to form a combustible gas which is brought to the surface in a production well, cleaned and used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. A cavity is formed as the coal burns and the roof collapses. This results in lateral growth and is allowed to continue until the product gas quality deteriorates. The greater the lateral growth, the longer the life of a gasifier and the more cost-effective the operation. When the quality of the product gas falls, fresh coal is ignited further along the injection well. Once the coal within the underground gasifier has been exhausted, new injection and production wells are drilled and the process is repeated.

Injecting oxygen rather than air reduces the nitrogen content and raises the heating value of the produced gas to the ‘medium-Btu’ gas range – of heating value roughly one-fourth of natural gas. If the goal is high-Btu gas (also called as substitute natural gas or SNG), the percentage of methane in the produced gases needs to be boosted. For methane formation in UCG, two additional steps are required. First, some of the carbon monoxide made in the gasification process is reacted with steam to form additional hydrogen. This step, called shift conversion, sets up the proper ratio of gases for the next step called methanation. The hot gas thus produced is allowed to pass through the coal seam to the exit boreholes and is carried to the surface where it is cleaned and upgraded for use. The whole aspect is elaborated in next paragraphs.

In fact, gasification differs from combustion which takes place when coal is burned in excess oxygen to produce carbon dioxide and water. Another important difference between coal combustion and coal gasification is in pollutant formation. The reducing atmosphere in gasification converts sulphur (S) from coal to hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and nitrogen (N) to ammonia (NH3), whereas combustion (oxidation) produces sulphur dioxide (SO2) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx).

The principal processes can be divided into two stages, namely (i) pyrolysis (also known as carbonisation, devolatilisation or thermal decomposition) and (ii) gasification. During pyrolysis coal is converted to a char releasing tars, oils, low molecular hydrocarbons and other gases. Gasification occurs when water, oxygen, carbon oxide and hydrogen react with the char.

The main gases produced are carbon dioxide, methane (CH4), hydrogen and carbon monoxide (CO) and oxygen. CH4 is essentially a product of pyrolysis, rather than gasification. Its formation is favoured by low temperature and high pressure.

ucg-1

In a theoretical appraisal of the gasification process, the Autothermal Chemical Equilibrium (ACE) condition exists. This is a condition at which the heat value of the product gas and the conversion efficiency of the gasified coal (chemical energy of product gas/chemical energy of gasified coal) is a maximum. At high temperatures and pressures (say 5MPa, 900°C), ACE conditions are approached rapidly but at lower temperatures and pressures the time to attain equilibrium greatly exceed the residence time of the gases in the gasifier and therefore ACE will not be attained.

The basic reactions can be generalised to a simple empirical form:

C + O2 → CO2 (+heat)

C + CO2 (+heat) → 2CO

C + H2O (+heat) → H2 + CO

C + 2H2 → CH4 (+heat)

During pyrolysis coal, subjected to high temperatures, yields higher heat value gases than ACE gasification products for a relatively small consumption of O2. Pressure increases the proportion of coal pyrolysed to form methane thus raising the heat value of the product gases. There is also some evidence to suggest that elevated pressures cause pyrolysis processes to penetrate in situ coal, further enhancing the gasifier yield.

4. Gasification circuit and Cavity behaviour: The gasification circuit requires a flow link to be achieved between an injection and a production well. Methods of achieving the link are:

* Accurate drilling assisted by a target device in the vertical well if necessary.

* Reverse combustion, involving ignition at the base of the production well.

Initially, channel created in coal seam using special drilling techniques. As reaction proceeds, channel grows, creating underground ‘cavity’. Volume of cavity increases progressively with progress of reaction.

Installation of well pairs (injection and production wells) is costly and therefore it is desirable to gasify the maximum volume of coal between a well pair. As gasification proceeds, a cavity is formed which will extend until the roof collapses. This roof collapse is important as it aids the lateral growth of the gasifier. Where the roof is strong and fails to break, or where the broken ground is blocky and poorly consolidated, some fluid reactants will by-pass the coal and the reactor efficiency could decline rapidly.

The most successful gasifier or reactor control process, developed in the USA, involves the use of a burner attached to coiled tubing. The device is used to burn through the borehole casing and ignite the coal. The ignition system can be moved to any desired location in the injection well. This ‘controlled retraction of ignition point’ (CRIP) technique enables a new reactor to be started at any chosen upstream location after a declining reactor has been abandoned.

crips

5. Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) :

There is growing concern among climate scientists and policy scholars that the global community must reduce greenhouse gas emissions significantly and quickly to prevent catastrophic climate change. Recognizing that fossil fuels now meet 85% of global energy and that global energy demand is increasing, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) will be an important option to limit carbon dioxide emissions. In fact, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an approach to mitigate global warming by capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) from large point sources such as fossil fuel power plants and storing it instead of releasing it into the atmosphere. Technology for large scale capture of CO2 is already commercially available and fairly well developed. Although CO2 has been injected into geological formations for various purposes, the long term storage of CO2 is a relatively untried concept and as yet no large scale power plant operates with a full carbon capture and storage system.

In the case of UCG, if the CO2 is to be captured at the surface and sequestered, it must be separated from the syngas. At a UCG production site, a significant percentage of the CO2 would likely be sequestered in the void left by the burned coal seam. Ideally, remaining CO2 can be sequestered in deep geologic formations nearby.

If the CO2 is not sequestered in place, it can be piped to oil fields. Oil companies can then inject it underground to increase production from oil and natural gas wells, a process called enhanced oil recovery. This represents an opportunity to sequester carbon at a lower cost compared with storing it in geologic repositories.

carbon_sequestration

6. Monitoring and Control: In order for the gasification process to be controlled, it is essential that continuous analytical measurement of the product gas stream is available.

Injection flow rate and composition, temperature and pressure were measured at various parts of the circuit to facilitate control of the gasifier and to ensure pressure and temperature design limits of system components were not exceeded. The manipulation of the following variables allowed the reaction rate and the gas quality to be adjusted within certain limits:

(i) Injected gas flow rate and composition

(ii) Reactor back pressure

(iii) Production well base temperature

(iv) Safety monitoring and alarm control

7. Technical requirements: Important technical requirements and considerations in designing a commercial gas production scheme:

(i) A cost-effective means of acquiring high-resolution coal seam geological data

(ii) Reproducible drilling accuracy

(iii) Multiple, independent gasifier units (with separate injection and production wells) to ensure systems failures do not totally halt gas production

(iv) Integrated surface plant using readily available off-the-shelf equipment wherever practicable.

The most critical element of deep UCG is arguably the directional drilling. Technologies exist which are capable of achieving the required precision but there is considerable uncertainty about the general drillability of coal seams in other than ideal conditions.

8. Environmental Impact and its Control: The main environmental issues concerning UCG are:

(i) Atmospheric emissions;

(ii) Surface water;

(iii) Drinking water pollutants;

(iv) Noise;

(v) Site operations;

(vi) Groundwater;

(vii) Subsidence.

9. Conclusion: Today, high prices of oil and gas and uncertainties about political stability in most of oil producing countries, have renewed interest in all kinds of fuel. A renewed interest in coal gasification is therefore not surprising. Further-more, hydrogen is now a welcome by-product because of the current interest in alternatively fueled vehicles. UCG is potentially the most important clean coal technology of the future with worldwide application. Ultimately, it could be a substitute for deep mining coal for power generation use.

Applying improved UCG technology to gasify deep, thin, and low grade coal seams could vastly increase the amount of exploitable reserves. The coal could be converted to gas for a variety of uses and emissions of sulphur, nitrous oxides and mercury could be dramatically reduced. UCG could increase recoverable coal reserves by as much as 300 to 400 percent. Another benefit of UCG is that hydrogen accounts for nearly half the total gas product which can be separated and actively used as automotive fuel or as feed-stock for the Chemical Industry.

Countries are turning to UCG to fully utilize their coal resources in an economically viable and environmentally acceptable manner. Using UCG technology even without a carbon-capture-and-sequestration plan could also be eligible for carbon credits.

10. Summary: Underground coal gasification (UCG) involves injecting steam and air or oxygen (O2) into a coal seam from a surface well. The injected gases react with coal to form a combustible gas which is brought to the surface in a production well, cleaned and used as a fuel or chemical feedstock. A cavity is formed as the coal burns and the roof is allowed to collapse. This process results in lateral growth of the gasifier in the seam and is allowed to continue until the quality of the product gas declines. When this occurs the seam is re-ignited at a new location further along the gasifier. Once the coal within the underground gasifier has been exhausted, new injection and production wells are drilled alongside the exhausted gasifier and the process is repeated.

UCG has the potential to exploit coal resources which are either uneconomic to work by conventional underground coal extraction, or inaccessible due to depth, geology or other mining and safety considerations. The successful development of UCG will not only depend on advances in the use of technology but also on demonstrating that a clean energy can be produced without detriment to the environment. As a method of exploiting coal, UCG represents a substantial environmental improvement on the combination of coal mining and surface combustion of coal.

The Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Process-

  • Process Wells (the collective term for the injection and production wells in a UCG project) are drilled into multiple coal seam/s.
  • The injection wells are used to feed a pressurized oxidant such as air or oxygen/steam into the coal seam.
  • The production wells recover the product gases.
  • The process wells  are connected within the coal seam by the linkage of low hydraulic resistance pathways that allow production and movement of the syngas.
  • At the surface the syngas is converted to Methane and then DME (Dimethyl Ether), if required, in a small chemical processing plant or for any other use.

UCG vs Surface Gasification-

  • UCG differs from  above-ground gasification in a number of ways:
  • Coal is not mined and chemical processes all occur in situ in the virgin coal seam/s.
  • Process water for gasification usually comes from the coal itself.
  • No ash or slag removal and handling are necessary since they stay underground.
  • Production cost of Methane or DME is far lower using UCG than from the conventional mining and processing of coal to produce Methane or DME.

11. Projects of Underground coal gasification (UCG): As discussed, UCG will develop more global reserves using in-situ conversion of stranded coal deposits into power, fuels, chemicals and other products. Nearly 85% of known coal reserves are unmineable with surface mining techniques, but UCG is producing fuels and hydrocarbon feedstock today from unrecoverable coal deposits.

Countries are turning to UCG to fully utilize their coal resources in an economically viable and environmentally acceptable manner. Using UCG technology even without a carbon-capture-and-sequestration plan could also be eligible for carbon credits.

  • In the US, BP and GasTech Inc. are developing an UCG demonstration project that will test GasTech’s technology in the Powder River Basin that will be followed by a commercial-scale UCG project. BP and Ergo Energy Technologies will cooperate in UCG projects using Ergo’s expertise in developing once unrecoverable coal through its proprietary in-situ technology.
  • BP also signed with Lawrence Livermore National Lab to cooperate in UCG technology development and projects, addressing carbon management to evaluate CO2 storage feasibility; environmental risk assessment/management; and numerical modeling of UCG processes.
  • India sees coal gasification as a major energy source for achieving the country’s economic growth, and anticipates the technology contributing as much as 9% to 10% to the country’s domestic energy needs over the next five years. India looks to utilize its vast coal reserves, which are the forth-largest reserves in the world, to reduce dependency on oil and gas imports. Given its growing demand, UCG will be used to tap India’s coal reserves that are difficult to extract economically using conventional technologies.
  • South Africa is at the forefront of research in using lower-grade coal for power generation. Eskom’s UCG pilot plant at its Majuba power station in Mpumalanga uses UCG syngas to fuel the station’s boilers. A proposed $3 billion, 2,100-MW IGCC power station will receive syngas from an adjacent commercial-scale UCG project.
  • Construction is under way on China’s first UCG project in the Northern Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. The $112 million project is a joint venture between Hebei Xin’ao Group and China University of Mining and Technology. The project will produce 1.5 MMcmd of syngas and yield 100,000-tpy of methanol, as well as generate 32.4 million kWh/year of power.
  • Vietnam Coal and Minerals Corp., Marubeni and Linc Energy will use UCG technology to develop 30 billon tons of bituminous coal reserves in the Song Hong (Red River) Delta for power generation. Marubeni initially provided $100 million to explore the area.
  • Cougar Energy UK is also developing a 400-MW Pakistani power project with the country’s Sindh Coal Authority that will use UCG to gasify Thar coalfield reserves.
  • Alberta is playing host to a deep underground coal gasification demonstration project. The Canadian province claims the demonstration is among the first of its kind in North America and is possibly the deepest underground coal gasification ever conducted in the world. The Government of Alberta, through the Alberta Energy Research Institute, is providing $8.83 million (US$6.7 mn) to the $30 million (US$23.6 mn) project with Swan Hills Synfuels of Calgary. Swan Hills expects the project to demonstrate the ability to manufacture synthetic gas from Alberta’s coal resources, with the future potential of using the coal seams for carbon capture and storage.

References:

  1. www.coal.gov.uk/…/ucgoverview.cfm
  2. www.coal-ucg.com/concept.html
  3. www.intellasia.net/…/resources/111244481.shtml
  4. www.cbc.ca/…/kyoto/capturing-carbon.html
  5. http://coalandfuel.blogspot.com/2008/09/underground-coal-gasification-ucg.html
  6. http://knol.google.com/k/partha-das-sharma/underground-coal-gasification-ucg/oml631csgjs7/17


Responses

  1. Great Job
    interesting topic , I would like to read more on this topic and Steam Coal Suppliers .

  2. The definition for underground Coal Gasification is very attractive.

  3. Very interesting. But I cannot get how CO2 could be stored in there – it will not surely be held by absorption on coal internal surface (as for ECBM)…

  4. its nice source to get energy and if we apply condencation trick on exit smoke we get other organic chamical,s .
    i think if we ignite the coal the coal seam change its compaction due to ignetion ,become softer,and the upper strata of coal bed will colape and the geological sequence will disrupted and a huge area of the field will sunk, may couse a deprational apearence, may be a crator will create and may earth feature will show us a great depration.
    (asrar qadri,karachi,pakistan)

    • Dear Asrar Qadri; you have said about the condition of Subsidence; dear brother for your kind knowledge the occurrence of subsidence can be eliminated by considering the inter well distance from 20 -30 meters. For the purpose to avoid the subsidence room pillars with in the Coal seam are also developed by a very precise calculation of Coal seam combustion rate. that eliminate any chance of subsidence. so I hope your question has been fulfilled.

      • I believe unless you live next to an UCG plant you probably should not be allowed to comment on any forum. So, I do live next door to Linc Energy, some kilometers away, but they own my neighboring property. The stink from this process is nauseating, incredible that such a process is allowed anywhere in the world. So unless one of the fine supporters of UCG can come up with a means of removing the Linc Stink as the locals call it out here, the industry should be banned. Etch this into your mind, Linc Stink, I drove a documentary maker past it a week os so ago, he was desperate to get away, he was almost vomiting, as I was. Nothing environmentally friendly about the Linc Stink and the produced water is makes.

  5. i would like to get information about the problems encountered during the under ground coal gasofication.although it has enormous beneifts but definitely it must have some draw backs so we should think on this aspects also

    • There is an unbearable stink that comes from the Linc plant, Qld’s Department of Environment and Resource Managment is forcing Linc to address the odour issue. The Cougar plant at Kingaroy in Qld was shut down due to underground water contamination. Carbon SEnergy was investigated due to toxins leechning into a local stream. these are the only 3 plants to have trialed the process in Aus, all failed to one degree or another. It is ancient technology, with promiose but the uncontrollable environmental impacts will no doubt see it never fully functioning other than in third world countries who have little respect for their population.

  6. Yeh Mr. Qdari is right i’ m agree with his idea, & a geologist can under stand such sort of conditions & never any other Scientist, because the behavior of rocks, their depositional environment & other criteria which is present in subsurface may very well known by a Geoscientist. so, there are many environmental impact of UnderGround Coal Gassification the CBM coal bed methane is preferable, if the condition is present to extract from subsurface


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: